Here is how Ruben Navarette, Jr., sees the Republican loss of Hispanic support in 2008.
Specifically, there are five things that Republicans did which cost them Hispanic support.
They made language and culture the issue rather than illegality, which irked U.S.-born Hispanics who might otherwise have stayed out of the fray;
They didn’t condemn the racism in their ranks on the part of those who believe that Hispanic immigrants are inferior to the immigrants of old;
They let the debate digress from one that was anti-illegal immigration to one that was anti-immigrant to, finally, one that was anti-Hispanic;
They fell into the trap of offering simple solutions to what remains a complicated problem; and
They either assumed that Hispanics were not in play or that they could win some of those votes on the cheap with a spattering of Spanish ads.
Yes, indeed, Ruben, the Republican Party needs to be more open and welcoming. But as long as they think that nominating people like Sarah Palin is a good idea, I'm not holding my breath. I don't associate a pit bull with lipstick with a big, sincere, welcome sign. More like, "Beware of Dog!"
But Mr. Navarette makes one important point. In 2004, John Kerry did as badly among Hispanics as any Democrat since they started tracking these figures. It would be unwise of any party to take the Hispanic vote for granted. Moreover, it would be unwise for any party or candidate to treat the Hispanic vote as a unitary bloc. As this country's largest minority, Hispanics are going to swing elections for years to come. But they don't all swing the same way.
Glenn A Knight
Friday, November 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment